Recent Posts
  • A New Canadian Textualism Emerges from the Stratasphere
  • Abdicating Legislative Power: The Carbon Tax Case
  • Our Pythic Judges: SNC-Lavalin
  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Moving to Strike
  • On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020
  • Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller
  • A Textualist Critique of Bostock
  • Deconstructing Quebec’s “Shocking” Bill 61
  • The Phenomenon of Deferred Reasons: A Tale of Two SCC Decisions
  • Food for Thought on Stare Decisis: SCOTUS’s Decision in Ramos v Louisiana

Advocates for the Rule of LawAdvocates for the Rule of Law

  • Home
  • About ARL
    • Contact Us
    • Executive Committee
  • Articles

    Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good

    The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini

    On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020

  • Case Commentary

    Moving to Strike

    Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller

    A Textualist Critique of Bostock

  • ARL News
  • Support ARL
Home ⇾ 2019 ⇾ August

Monthly Archives: August 2019

R. v. Stillman: A Missed Opportunity for Guidance on Stare Decisis

August 19, 2019 1 Comment

On July 26, 2019, in R. v. Stillman, 2019 SCC 40,the Supreme Court of Canada held by a 5-2 majority that a member of the Canadian Forces does not have the right to trial by jury for a “civilian” criminal offence for which they are charged under the National Defence Act (the “NDA”). Section 130(1)(a) of the NDA converts any ...

Read More »

Recent Comments

  • Annoyed on The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Law, liberty and the pursuit of the common good | Advocates for the Rule of Law on The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Asher Honickman on The Constitutional Basis for Judicial Review in Canada
  • James on The Constitutional Basis for Judicial Review in Canada
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies on Nothing to Declare: Part II

Recent Posts

  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Moving to Strike
  • On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020
  • Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller

  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • In No Certain Terms: The Problem with Parliament’s Marijuana Legalization Law

    February 8, 2018
  • The Case for a Constrained Approach to Section 7

    June 22, 2016
  • ARL is Headed to the Supreme Court of Canada

    October 3, 2017
  • Reaffirming the Case for Constraint: A Reply to Léonid Sirota

    July 29, 2016
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause

    February 25, 2020
  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good

    March 8, 2021
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini

    March 3, 2021
  • Moving to Strike

    November 24, 2020
  • On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020

    September 9, 2020
  • Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller

    August 17, 2020
  • Annoyed: I'm afraid that most of what passes as legal philosophy in t...
  • Law, liberty and the pursuit of the common good | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] response to Sirota and Mancini, Stéphane Sérafin,...
  • Asher Honickman: How so?...
  • James: This is an aside, but it is worth mentioning nonetheless. Th...
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies: […] * Maxime St-Hilaire is Associate Professor, Facult...

  • Register
  • Lost your password?

Recent Posts

  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Moving to Strike

Recent Comments

  • Annoyed: I'm afraid that most of what passes as legal philosophy in t...
  • Law, liberty and the pursuit of the common good | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] response to Sirota and Mancini, Stéphane Sérafin,...
  • Asher Honickman: How so?...
  • James: This is an aside, but it is worth mentioning nonetheless. Th...
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies: […] * Maxime St-Hilaire is Associate Professor, Facult...
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies: […] in two parts on the Advocates for the Rule of Law ...
  • Roger: Pretty dank....
  • Nothing to Declare: Part II | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber,...
  • Applying Vavilov: Canada Post and Health and Safety - Daizy A. Bethea Law Firm | Barristers, Solicitors and Notary Public | lawyer2call: […] brief assessments of Vavilov, see Gerard Kennedy,...
  • Easing the Stress on Constitutional Democracy | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] Constitutional Democracy Under Stress: Developing...

Categories

  • ARL News (46)
  • Articles (94)
  • Case Commentary (71)
  • Featured (50)

Stay Up To Date

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • 2021
    • March
  • 2020
    • November
    • September
    • August
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright 2021 Advocates for the Rule of Law | By accessing this site, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. Please read them.