Recent Posts
  • A New Canadian Textualism Emerges from the Stratasphere
  • Abdicating Legislative Power: The Carbon Tax Case
  • Our Pythic Judges: SNC-Lavalin
  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Moving to Strike
  • On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020
  • Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller
  • A Textualist Critique of Bostock
  • Deconstructing Quebec’s “Shocking” Bill 61
  • The Phenomenon of Deferred Reasons: A Tale of Two SCC Decisions
  • Food for Thought on Stare Decisis: SCOTUS’s Decision in Ramos v Louisiana

Advocates for the Rule of LawAdvocates for the Rule of Law

  • Home
  • About ARL
    • Contact Us
    • Executive Committee
  • Articles

    Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good

    The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini

    On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020

  • Case Commentary

    Moving to Strike

    Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller

    A Textualist Critique of Bostock

  • ARL News
  • Support ARL
Home ⇾ Tag Archives: pleadings

Tag Archives: pleadings

Moving to Strike

November 24, 2020 Leave a comment

I recently went on the Runnymede Radio podcast to discuss how the law on motions to strike pleadings to determine novel questions of law may be changing after decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada earlier this year in Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya (“Nevsun”) and Atlantic Lottery Corp Inc v Babstock (“Atlantic Lottery”). In this blog post, I briefly ...

Read More »

Recent Comments

  • Annoyed on The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Law, liberty and the pursuit of the common good | Advocates for the Rule of Law on The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Asher Honickman on The Constitutional Basis for Judicial Review in Canada
  • James on The Constitutional Basis for Judicial Review in Canada
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies on Nothing to Declare: Part II

Recent Posts

  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Moving to Strike
  • On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020
  • Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller

  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • In No Certain Terms: The Problem with Parliament’s Marijuana Legalization Law

    February 8, 2018
  • The Case for a Constrained Approach to Section 7

    June 22, 2016
  • ARL is Headed to the Supreme Court of Canada

    October 3, 2017
  • Reaffirming the Case for Constraint: A Reply to Léonid Sirota

    July 29, 2016
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause

    February 25, 2020
  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good

    March 8, 2021
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini

    March 3, 2021
  • Moving to Strike

    November 24, 2020
  • On Responsible Scholarship: A Reply to Stepan Wood, Meinhard Doelle, and Dayna Scott September 8, 2020

    September 9, 2020
  • Destabilizing the Doctrine: A Critique of Uber v. Heller

    August 17, 2020
  • Annoyed: I'm afraid that most of what passes as legal philosophy in t...
  • Law, liberty and the pursuit of the common good | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] response to Sirota and Mancini, Stéphane Sérafin,...
  • Asher Honickman: How so?...
  • James: This is an aside, but it is worth mentioning nonetheless. Th...
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies: […] * Maxime St-Hilaire is Associate Professor, Facult...

  • Register
  • Lost your password?

Recent Posts

  • Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good
  • The Common Good in Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini
  • Moving to Strike

Recent Comments

  • Annoyed: I'm afraid that most of what passes as legal philosophy in t...
  • Law, liberty and the pursuit of the common good | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] response to Sirota and Mancini, Stéphane Sérafin,...
  • Asher Honickman: How so?...
  • James: This is an aside, but it is worth mentioning nonetheless. Th...
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies: […] * Maxime St-Hilaire is Associate Professor, Facult...
  • Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause - Centre for Constitutional Studies: […] in two parts on the Advocates for the Rule of Law ...
  • Roger: Pretty dank....
  • Nothing to Declare: Part II | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber,...
  • Applying Vavilov: Canada Post and Health and Safety - Daizy A. Bethea Law Firm | Barristers, Solicitors and Notary Public | lawyer2call: […] brief assessments of Vavilov, see Gerard Kennedy,...
  • Easing the Stress on Constitutional Democracy | Advocates for the Rule of Law: […] Constitutional Democracy Under Stress: Developing...

Categories

  • ARL News (46)
  • Articles (94)
  • Case Commentary (71)
  • Featured (50)

Stay Up To Date

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • 2021
    • March
  • 2020
    • November
    • September
    • August
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright 2021 Advocates for the Rule of Law | By accessing this site, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. Please read them.