{"id":2980,"date":"2018-11-03T21:40:07","date_gmt":"2018-11-03T21:40:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/?p=2980"},"modified":"2019-02-15T04:13:09","modified_gmt":"2019-02-15T04:13:09","slug":"arls-factum-in-the-vavilov-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/arls-factum-in-the-vavilov-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"ARL&#8217;s Factum in the Vavilov and Bell\/NFL Appeals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For those interested in reading ARL&#8217;s factum in the standard of review appeals, it can be read <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Vavilov-Appeal-SCC-37748-Factum-of-Intervenor-ARL.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you again to our excellent counsel at McCarthy&#8217;s, especially Adam Goldenberg, for putting together such a superb factum.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For those interested in reading ARL&#8217;s factum in the standard of review appeals, it can be read here. Thank you again to our excellent counsel at McCarthy&#8217;s, especially Adam Goldenberg, for putting together such a superb factum.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2984,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[77],"tags":[396,56,64,468],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2980"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2980"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2980\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2985,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2980\/revisions\/2985"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ruleoflaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}