Advocates for the Rule of Law
On March 8, 2019, ARL filed its factum at the Supreme Court of Canada in ...
Read More »Featured
-
Our Pythic Judges: SNC-Lavalin
-
The Problem with Prosecutorial Independence in Canada
-
Military Justice and Stare Decisis: ARL Returns to the SCC
-
Substantive Equality: Some People are More Equal Than Others
-
In Defence of Substantive Equality
-
Unearthing Canadian Originalism: Reflections on my Conversation with Justice Stratas
-
Ontario Court of Appeal Underscores the Importance of Adversarial Argument
-
A Matter of Deductions: Resolving Uncertainty in MVA Litigation
Case Commentary
Ontario Court of Appeal Underscores the Importance of Adversarial Argument
Last week’s unusual Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Welsh v Ontario made headlines as ...
Read More »
A Matter of Deductions: Resolving Uncertainty in MVA Litigation
As any Ontario personal injury lawyer knows, the common law of damages has been modified ...
Read More »
Statutory Interpretation in Canadian Administrative Law
Over on Professor Daly’s blog Administrative Law Matters, Professor Audrey Macklin wrote what I would ...
Read More »
The Administrative Law “Trilogy”: The Stare Decisis Trap
This week, the Supreme Court of Canada finally heard the consolidated appeals in Bell/NFL and ...
Read More »Articles
-
Our Pythic Judges: SNC-Lavalin
In Ancient Greece, travelers from far and wide descended upon the Oracle at Delphi. Known ...
Read More » -
The Problem with Prosecutorial Independence in Canada
-
Substantive Equality: Some People are More Equal Than Others
-
In Defence of Substantive Equality
-
Unearthing Canadian Originalism: Reflections on my Conversation with Justice Stratas
-
The “Cultural Appropriation” Criticism: Lousy Analogy and Censorship in Disguise
-
Understanding Unconstitutionality
ARL News
-
ARL Files Factum in Stillman Appeal
On March 8, 2019, ARL filed its factum at the Supreme Court of Canada in ...
Read More » -
Military Justice and Stare Decisis: ARL Returns to the SCC
-
ARL at the Supreme Court
-
ARL’s Factum in the Vavilov and Bell/NFL Appeals
-
Supreme Court Rejects Duty to Consult in Legislative Process
-
Discussing the Notwithstanding Clause
-
ARL is Heading Back to the Supreme Court