Advocates for the Rule of Law
On October 6, 2019, I had the pleasure of speaking at a conference entitled “Constitutional ...
Read More »Featured
-
Toronto v Ontario: Correcting Results-Oriented Reasoning
-
R. v. Stillman: A Missed Opportunity for Guidance on Stare Decisis
-
Constitutional Democracy Under Stress: Developing A Resistance To Unaccountable Government
-
Deconstructing Section 28
-
ARL Celebrates Five Years and Charitable Status
-
Losing Rights in the Balance
-
The Political Consequences of Deference are not Always the Same
-
Deference to Administrators Must be Legislated not Assumed
Case Commentary
Toronto v Ontario: Correcting Results-Oriented Reasoning
It is not often that I can write a post in full agreement with a ...
Read More »
R. v. Stillman: A Missed Opportunity for Guidance on Stare Decisis
On July 26, 2019, in R. v. Stillman, 2019 SCC 40,the Supreme Court of Canada ...
Read More »
Losing Rights in the Balance
Back in 2008, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) issued a new ...
Read More »
The Political Consequences of Deference are not Always the Same
In my last post on this blog, I commented and mostly praised two recent blog ...
Read More »Articles
-
Constitutional Democracy Under Stress: Developing A Resistance To Unaccountable Government
One of the litmus tests of the legitimacy of any government that presides over a ...
Read More » -
Deconstructing Section 28
-
Deference to Administrators Must be Legislated not Assumed
-
Abdicating Legislative Power: The Carbon Tax Case
-
Our Pythic Judges: SNC-Lavalin
-
The Problem with Prosecutorial Independence in Canada
-
Substantive Equality: Some People are More Equal Than Others
ARL News
-
Easing the Stress on Constitutional Democracy
On October 6, 2019, I had the pleasure of speaking at a conference entitled “Constitutional ...
Read More » -
ARL Celebrates Five Years and Charitable Status
-
The Original Meaning of Military Law
-
ARL Files Factum in Stillman Appeal
-
Military Justice and Stare Decisis: ARL Returns to the SCC
-
ARL at the Supreme Court
-
ARL’s Factum in the Vavilov and Bell/NFL Appeals